[Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics

[roland.illig at gmx dot de via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795

            Bug ID: 104795
           Summary: inconsistent wording in diagnostics
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
  Target Milestone: ---

>From i386.c:
> %<-m96bit-long-double%> is not compatible with this target
> %<-mpreferred-stack-boundary%> is not supported for this target

Is there a semantic difference in the above messages? If not, please use the
same words for them. For the benefit of translators, please use the following
pattern, so that I as a translator don't have a chance of introducing
copy-and-paste mistakes:

error ("%qs is not supported for this target", "-m96bit-long-double");