[Bug target/105428] compilation never (?) finishes with __builtin_casinl() and __builtin_csqrtl() with -O -mlong-double-128

2022-04-29 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105428 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If you can identify specific arguments passed to mpc_asin for which it is excessively slow, that should be reported as an MPC bug. Computing correctly rounded mpc_asin shouldn't need to

[Bug target/105428] compilation never (?) finishes with __builtin_casinl() and __builtin_csqrtl() with -O -mlong-double-128

2022-04-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105428 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105428] compilation never (?) finishes with __builtin_casinl() and __builtin_csqrtl() with -O -mlong-double-128

2022-04-28 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105428 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1) > What MPC version are you using? Thank you for the reply. If I understand the backtrace correctly I am using the libraries downloaded by the

[Bug target/105428] compilation never (?) finishes with __builtin_casinl() and __builtin_csqrtl() with -O -mlong-double-128

2022-04-28 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105428 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- What MPC version are you using? There have been a few fixes for slowness in the MPC inverse trigonometric and hyperbolic functions over the years, though there may still be scope for