[Bug target/112573] Suboptimal code generation with `-fdata-sections` on aarch64

2024-01-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112573 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db4e496aadf1d7ab1c5af24410394d1551ddd3f0 commit r14-7284-gdb4e496aadf1d7ab1c5af24410394d1551ddd3f0 Author: Wilco Dijkstra Date:

[Bug target/112573] Suboptimal code generation with `-fdata-sections` on aarch64

2023-11-20 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112573 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/112573] Suboptimal code generation with `-fdata-sections` on aarch64

2023-11-16 Thread jwerner at chromium dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112573 --- Comment #2 from Julius Werner --- Sorry, I don't really know what reassociation means in this context. Are you saying that the behavior is WAI? Note that the problem also exists when you write the accesses in h() as: *(a + (y +

[Bug target/112573] Suboptimal code generation with `-fdata-sections` on aarch64

2023-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112573 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1