https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113365
--- Comment #4 from newbie-02 ---
hello @Andrew Pinski,
just if I'm allowed to add one more point / question:
using the testing program, playing with optimization, I get
the following results for binary64s ( doubles ):
unoptimized:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113365
--- Comment #3 from newbie-02 ---
hi, thank you, super service, super fast, works!
can't tell if the -O0 behaviour is meaningful ...
but think it is rarely used. I came to it in my
attempts to avoid compiler cheating / optimizing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113365
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113365
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
