[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:beabb96786e4b3e1a820e400c09b1c1c9ab06287 commit r11-10968-gbeabb96786e4b3e1a820e400c09b1c1c9ab06287 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d04993b217f42b8e60b7a6d66647966b1e41302d commit r12-9836-gd04993b217f42b8e60b7a6d66647966b1e41302d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8ea576111a499595b0fe9d879830ae03afbaf17 commit r13-7767-gf8ea576111a499595b0fe9d879830ae03afbaf17 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49a3b35c4068091900b657cd36e5cffd41ef0c47 commit r14-3563-g49a3b35c4068091900b657cd36e5cffd41ef0c47 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 55811 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55811=edit gcc14-pr111015.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-16 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson --- Reverting the pass_store_merging::process_store hunk makes this test case work again: diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc index 0d19b98ed73..c4bf8eec64e

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-15 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/111015] [11/12/13/14 Regression] __int128 bitfields optimized incorrectly to the 64 bit operations

2023-08-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111015 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|__int128