[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2022-12-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhaberman at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2017-08-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2017-08-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- As a data point, Clang manages to optimize at least the simple case in bug 81788 as expected. No other compiler I've tested does (IBM XLC, Intel ICC, Visual Studio, or Sun/Oracle Studio).

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2017-08-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2014-01-08 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2014-01-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Clobber list should be flow |escaped set

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

2014-01-07 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) Would it be possible to compute ESCAPED per basic block as a local set, compute transitive closure over the CFG, and use that