https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the loop one looks like:
if (input_4(D) != 0)
goto ; [89.00%]
else
goto ; [11.00%]
[local count: 105119324]:
_1 = (unsigned int) input_4(D);
_3 = -_1;
value_2 = (int) _3;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Mine, After PR 25290, the below match.pd pattern will just work :).
>
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> > and something that could be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the loop based one is a little more complex due to the way GCC IR handles
overflow being wrapping or undefined; I am just going to fix the case where
overflow is defined as wrapping. The other case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||25290
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
--- Comment #4 from Joel Yliluoma ---
Still confirmed on GCC 10 (Debian 10-20200324-1) 10.0.1 20200324 (experimental)
[master revision
596c90d3559:023579257f5:906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536]
Seems I lack the oomph to update the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This looks like the unary version of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00014.html
and something that could be auto-generated from a pattern like:
(cond (ne @0 0) (negate
