https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Yes, I think that translating a DO loop into something like
int i;
for (i=0; i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Don't ask how long I'd been staring at the assembly in disbelief until I
figured out what had gone wrong :-)
In this particular case the problem can be addressed by passing into the
function instead of ,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Tobias Schlüter from comment #1)
> There's a typo in the example, /= instead of !=. Fixed example below:
The disease of a Fortran programmer writing C, I guess :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
Tobias Schlüter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Keywords|
