[Bug tree-optimization/99408] s3251 benchmark of TSVC vectorized by clang runs about 7 times faster compared to gcc

2023-01-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99408 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- On Zen4 it is 20s for gcc and 6.9s for aocc, so still a problem.

[Bug tree-optimization/99408] s3251 benchmark of TSVC vectorized by clang runs about 7 times faster compared to gcc

2023-01-11 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99408 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- with zen4 gcc build loop takes 19s, while aocc 6.6. aocc: .LBB0_1:# %for.cond22.preheader # =>This Loop Header: Depth=1

[Bug tree-optimization/99408] s3251 benchmark of TSVC vectorized by clang runs about 7 times faster compared to gcc

2022-11-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99408 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- This also reproduces with zen4 and double. jh@alberti:~/tsvc/bin> cat tt.c typedef double real_t; #define iterations 10 #define LEN_1D 32000 #define LEN_2D 256 real_t

[Bug tree-optimization/99408] s3251 benchmark of TSVC vectorized by clang runs about 7 times faster compared to gcc

2021-12-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99408 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement