https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||141242068 at smail dot
nju.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100595
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Updated testcase:
```
typedef __UINTPTR_TYPE__ uintptr_t;
int test2() {
static uintptr_t a = (uintptr_t)(& + ((char *)& - (char *)&));
l1:
l2:
return (int)a;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terminatorul at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39398
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623
--- Comment #4 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
That is precisely the design error of C/C++/etc. There should be no
float/double/long double/__float128/etc, but *only* floatN_t. Then there
wouldn't be these discrepancies (if necessary you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114601
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
This is still failing as of r14-9822 (after the second PR114599#c7 fix).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82014
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81916
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800#c4
Basically libquadmath should be using sqrt128f if it exist for sqrtq instead of
doing a version itself ... But libquadmath is normally only used for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623
--- Comment #2 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
void print_hex(const std::float128_t value)
{
std::array
buffer{};
const std::to_chars_result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Please don't just link against godbolt and attach the preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623
Bug ID: 114623
Summary: sqrt
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libquadmath
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80670
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88371
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at geometrian dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87129
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66586
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Dup.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56842 ***
I should dup and fixed in GCC 9.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66586
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.1.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84358
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-02-13 00:00:00 |2024-4-6
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87063
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
EDG also rejects this:
```
"", line 21: error: function "foo::operator=(const foo &)" (declared
implicitly) cannot be referenced -- it is a deleted function
a = foo();
^
```
I remember there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87791
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm,
GCC is acting treating `Arr a;` like `Arr a{};`. I have not looked into why
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114617
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53251
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramon.garcia.f+gcc at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114617
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e3c8257304c55f2ebfb24bd6de3236bda0f054e
commit r14-9823-g4e3c8257304c55f2ebfb24bd6de3236bda0f054e
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80594
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77887
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114004
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So, the rlwinm keeps all the top 32 bits intact, but those are all zero to
begin
with. Somehow we don't see that, or don't take that into account anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114622
Bug ID: 114622
Summary: memcmp -Wstringop-overread false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81270
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81270
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-10-15 00:00:00 |2024-4-6
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.4
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621
Bug ID: 114621
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable
insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large
offset
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yea. I think my first one in this space was in the mid 90s on the PA. Sigh.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-06
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114620
Bug ID: 114620
Summary: Pointer-to-member template argument which is the
member of a base class is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619
Bug ID: 114619
Summary: [14 regression] ICE with -fno-elide-constructors in
C++14 mode for non-constant initializer in array new
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114590
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93adf88cc6744aa2c732b765e1e3b96e66cb3300
commit r14-9822-g93adf88cc6744aa2c732b765e1e3b96e66cb3300
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #38 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93adf88cc6744aa2c732b765e1e3b96e66cb3300
commit r14-9822-g93adf88cc6744aa2c732b765e1e3b96e66cb3300
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106813
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114550
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114590
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06a7e7514af67d9f3c51fe7a592b5166da791e2f
commit r14-9820-g06a7e7514af67d9f3c51fe7a592b5166da791e2f
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Apr 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
Nice work indeed, in an area that clearly needed it, thanks!
Something potentially problematic though:
+package body System.CRTL is
+
+ -- In GNAT, Duration'Size = 64.
+ function Duration_To_int64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by J?rgen Kvalsvik :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6892a430a9752aea167265621c3ae7a3e11159f
commit r14-9819-gc6892a430a9752aea167265621c3ae7a3e11159f
Author: Jørgen Kvalsvik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 57892
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57892=edit
Fix for this PR
The attachment has two fixes for the PR :-)
The first chunk in trans-array.cc is an alternative to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |libfortran
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114617
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
With the patch the reported failure examples above pass:
$ gm2 -g -c BasicFileSys.mod
-I../../../../Sandpit/gm2-outside-tree-tests/build/source/m2pp/src/ -fsources
Compiling: BasicFileSys.mod
Pass 0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 69571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58601
Bug 58601 depends on bug 69571, which changed state.
Bug 69571 Summary: [C++11] invalid alignas on a typedef accepted, reduces
alignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69571
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69571
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hstong at ca dot ibm.com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-09-14 00:00:00 |2024-4-6
Summary|Types and
65 matches
Mail list logo
