https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note libgcc uses t-gthr-noweak to get the define.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-netbsd
--- Comment #18 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #17 from n54 at gmx dot com ---
On 17.01.2020 18:15, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Those patches actually were sent to the list, and
On 17.01.2020 18:15, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Those patches actually were sent to the list, and I reviewed them, and got no
> reply:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2014-12/msg00069.html
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Those patches actually were sent to the list, and I reviewed them, and got no
reply:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2014-12/msg00069.html
I've committed them (after suitable updates) so the libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98d56ea8900fdcff8f1987cf2bf499a5b7399857
commit r10-6022-g98d56ea8900fdcff8f1987cf2bf499a5b7399857
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #12)
> After all, these patches are only a suggestion how GCC _might_ be fixed.
Which is exactly why patches should go to the mailing lists. The reviewer might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #12)
> It should not be the job of a bug reporter to understand all the
> internal workflows and actually commit the patches in the end.
"Send the patch to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roland.illig at gmx dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #1 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34254
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34254action=edit
libstdc++-patch2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #2 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34255
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34255action=edit
libstdc++-patch3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #3 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34256
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34256action=edit
libcilkrts1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #5 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34258
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34258action=edit
libgfortran-weak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #4 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34257
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34257action=edit
libcilkrts-thread
cilk uses a non-posix function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #6 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34259
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34259action=edit
test_summary
All gfortran tests fail to run due to bug #39570
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kai-Uwe Eckhardt from comment #0)
Created attachment 34253 [details]
libstdc++-patch1
Bootstrap of 5.0 fails on NetBSD, but with the patches in NetBSD's package
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kai-Uwe Eckhardt from comment #0)
Created attachment 34253 [details]
libstdc++-patch1
This introduces an ABI change.
Also, if _CTYPE_BL represents the blank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
Please submit them by posting them to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org.
And please CC libstd...@gcc.gnu.org for the three libstdc++ patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271
--- Comment #10 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
And please CC libstd...@gcc.gnu.org for the three libstdc++ patches.
Done.
22 matches
Mail list logo
