https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdcf7226c9fe87352466eb9a6bfc58fa24b3e5e1
commit r14-8324-gbdcf7226c9fe87352466eb9a6bfc58fa24b3e5e1
Author: Mikael Pettersson
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
--- Comment #5 from Thorsten Otto ---
I don't mind. If your patch also contains a test case, just use that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
--- Comment #3 from Thorsten Otto ---
Created attachment 55837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55837=edit
Avoid segmentation fault when calling assign_temp with a NULL type pointer
Attached is a potential patch to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
Thorsten Otto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ad...@tho-otto.de
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
sjlj-exceptions is very much not tested as much as the others.
