On Fri, 2022-01-28 at 15:18 -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> On 1/12/2022 2:02 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > sh-linux not supported any SH1 and SH2a little-endian.
> > Add exceptios it.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * config/sh/t-linux (MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS): Add m1, mb/m1 and
Hi.
This patch adds support for setting the alignment of variables in
libgccjit.
I was wondering if I should change it so that it takes/returns bytes
instead of bits.
What do you think?
Thanks for the review.
From ebdb6905f23ddef28292a1d71081eebb7a2a9bb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni
'inf/inf' should raise an invalid operation exception at runtime. So it
should not be folded during compilation unless -fno-trapping-math is
used.
gcc/
PR middle-end/95115
* fold-const.cc (const_binop): Do not fold "inf/inf".
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.dg/pr95115.c: New test.
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 18:06:28 +0100
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 16:54, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > From: Jonathan Wakely
> > > But there is nothing target-specific in that code, so it
> > > should be fine to disable them for simulators. They're
> > > already
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 16:54, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> (I had to add separation between your reply and mine in the
> quoted parts; you may be aware.)
>
> > From: Jonathan Wakely
> > Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:32:08 +0100
> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2022, 01:37 Hans-Peter Nilsson via Libstdc++,
> >
(I had to add separation between your reply and mine in the
quoted parts; you may be aware.)
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:32:08 +0100
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022, 01:37 Hans-Peter Nilsson via Libstdc++,
> mailto:libstdc%2b...@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
> > These tests have always
Thanks Jakob for the correction. Sadly, I didn’t have any access to any non x86
architecture. But x86 was fully tested and there was no regression.
In my spare time I will look at implementation of this for short-circuit
targets.
Best wishes,
Navid.
From: Jakub
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022, 01:37 Hans-Peter Nilsson via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> These tests have always been failing for my cris-elf
> autotester running a simulator; they take about 20 minutes
> each, compared to the timeout of 720 seconds, doubled
> because they timed out in
