Please, get serious.
=> this topic is closed for me, so STOP CC''ing ME, it is not welcome.
On Sun, 23 May 2021 at 19:03, Mike Stump wrote:
> This isn't a patch to gcc, please stop posting non-technical content to
> this list. Please review what this list is for and the rules for this list
>
This isn't a patch to gcc, please stop posting non-technical content to this
list. Please review what this list is for and the rules for this list before
you post again, thanks.
> On May 14, 2021, at 7:47 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> Hi there IT-fascists, clowns, master-clowns,
Hi there IT-fascists, clowns, master-clowns,
totally-confused-incompetent-code-plumbers,
activity-trapped-silent-high-performers,
stay-out-of-trouble-silent-high-performers! (Guess where G.J. Lay fits in
the collection...).
Please be aware that I do not read any messages here (including the one
abebeos via Gcc-patches schrieb:
Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence
of this, which is of course directly related to gcc.
(bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all starts here, at gcc.
* You postet a patch to gcc-patches@.
* You did not answer
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 18:49, abebeos
wrote:
> (failed to join gcc, so posting here)
>
> Is there any private email where one can file complaints re
> project-maintainers (or "those who are supervising the maintainers") ?
>
> Is there any information about the process for such complaints?
>
>
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 01:43, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/10/2021 3:45 PM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > I've described this in my message here:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/569913.html
> >
> > The summary is possibly
> > * I identified via necessary week-long
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 01:35, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:45 PM abebeos
> wrote:
> >
> > The bounty was filed/advertised by the gcc project, so the gcc project
> should have intervened immediately at the point where an anonymous coward
> rigged the voting process
On 5/10/2021 3:45 PM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've described this in my message here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/569913.html
The summary is possibly
* I identified via necessary week-long work a (shelved) patch as valid for
(re)use.
* The gcc project(members)
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:45 PM abebeos wrote:
>
> The bounty was filed/advertised by the gcc project, so the gcc project should
> have intervened immediately at the point where an anonymous coward rigged the
> voting process (aborted the vote before end of the voting period).
>
> The fact that
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 23:32, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021, 9:52 AM abebeos
> wrote:
>
>> Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence
>> of this, which is of course directly related to gcc.
>>
>> (bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all
(unable to comment to this without loosing my temper. So... no comment)
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 05:49, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 8:33 AM abebeos
> wrote:
> >
> > To me this sounds quite like an "disorganized mess, where bullies,
> abusers and even IT-fascists can thrive".
On Mon, May 10, 2021, 9:52 AM abebeos
wrote:
> Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence
> of this, which is of course directly related to gcc.
>
> (bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all starts here, at gcc.
>
What do you think that the GCC project
Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence
of this, which is of course directly related to gcc.
(bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all starts here, at gcc.
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 07:48:50PM
It is just fascinating to see how you don't realize that this affects
mainly gcc.
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 01:42, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
> > It is a gcc issue, see the very first link you've quoted (
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729).
>
> IIUC you're complaining about the
On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 07:48:50PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 8:33 AM abebeos
> wrote:
> >
> > To me this sounds quite like an "disorganized mess, where bullies, abusers
> > and even IT-fascists can thrive".
> >
> > It is clear to me that some gcc
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 8:33 AM abebeos wrote:
>
> To me this sounds quite like an "disorganized mess, where bullies, abusers
> and even IT-fascists can thrive".
>
> It is clear to me that some gcc project maintainers, the steering committee
> and bountysource are crossing ethical (if not legal)
> It is a gcc issue, see the very first link you've quoted (
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729).
IIUC you're complaining about the bounty process, not about the GCC PR, so
this technical list is not the appropriate place to do it. AFAICS you have
already filed a complaint
On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 20:32, Koning, Paul wrote:
>
>
> > On May 9, 2021, at 11:33 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your quick response.
> >
> > ...
> > The Issue:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
> >
> > The Bounty (a
> On May 9, 2021, at 11:33 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your quick response.
>
> ...
> The Issue:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
>
> The Bounty (a bit higher than $7K)
>
>
Thank you for your quick response.
To me this sounds quite like an "disorganized mess, where bullies, abusers
and even IT-fascists can thrive".
It is clear to me that some gcc project maintainers, the steering committee
and bountysource are crossing ethical (if not legal) boundaries.
The Issue:
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 8:49 AM abebeos via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Is there any private email where one can file complaints re
> project-maintainers (or "those who are supervising the maintainers") ?
>
> Is there any information about the process for such complaints?
>
> Related Issue:
(failed to join gcc, so posting here)
Is there any private email where one can file complaints re
project-maintainers (or "those who are supervising the maintainers") ?
Is there any information about the process for such complaints?
Related Issue:
22 matches
Mail list logo
