On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:09:07 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 21:36:26 +0200
> Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Dear Bernhard, all,
> >
> > Am 29.10.21 um 02:05 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches:
> >
> > >> diff --git
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 21:36:26 +0200
Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Dear Bernhard, all,
>
> Am 29.10.21 um 02:05 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches:
>
> >> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/symbol.c b/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
> >> index 53c760a6c38..cde34c67482 100644
> >> ---
Dear Bernhard, all,
Am 29.10.21 um 02:05 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/symbol.c b/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
index 53c760a6c38..cde34c67482 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
@@ -5052,7 +5052,7 @@ gfc_get_typebound_proc
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:54:21 -0700
Jerry D wrote:
> Looks good and simple. Proceed. Thanks
Committed as 7883a7f07c1ad9c8aaccc5bbd96e0ae1fa230c89
Thanks!
Maybe somebody could eyeball and ACK "Fix memory leak in finalization
wrappers"
Looks good and simple. Proceed. Thanks
Jerry
On 10/28/21 5:05 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran wrote:
ping
[Rebased, re-regtested cleanly. Ok for trunk?]
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:57:31 +
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
compiling
ping
[Rebased, re-regtested cleanly. Ok for trunk?]
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:57:31 +
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>
> compiling gfortran.dg/typebound_proc_31.f90 leaked the type-bound
> structs:
>
> 56 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost.
> at
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
compiling gfortran.dg/typebound_proc_31.f90 leaked the type-bound
structs:
56 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost.
at 0x4C2CC05: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
by 0x151EA90: xcalloc (xmalloc.c:162)
by 0x8E3E4F: gfc_get_typebound_proc(gfc_typebound_proc*)
