Re: [PATCH][GCC][Arm] Missing optimization pattern for rev16 on architectures with thumb1

2024-02-15 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 12/02/2024 13:48, Matthieu Longo wrote: > This patch marks a rev16 test as XFAIL for architectures having only Thumb1 > support. The generated code is functionally correct, but the optimization is > disabled when -mthumb is equivalent to Thumb1. Fixing the root issue would > requires changes

[PATCH][GCC][Arm] Missing optimization pattern for rev16 on architectures with thumb1

2024-02-12 Thread Matthieu Longo
This patch marks a rev16 test as XFAIL for architectures having only Thumb1 support. The generated code is functionally correct, but the optimization is disabled when -mthumb is equivalent to Thumb1. Fixing the root issue would requires changes that are not suitable for GCC14 stage 4. More