On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 at 21:39, François Dumont wrote:
> On 23/12/21 2:03 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 21/12/21 07:07 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> ??? Is there a chance for this patch to be integrated for next gcc
> >> release ?
> >
> > Yes, I think this can still make it
On 23/12/21 2:03 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/12/21 07:07 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
??? Is there a chance for this patch to be integrated for next gcc
release ?
Yes, I think this can still make it for GCC 12 (the patch was first
posted long ago in stage 1 and it's just me being
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 17:56, François Dumont via Libstdc++ <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> On 21/12/21 7:28 am, Daniel Krügler wrote:
> > Am Di., 21. Dez. 2021 um 07:08 Uhr schrieb François Dumont via
> > Libstdc++ :
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Is there a chance for this patch to be integrated for
On 21/12/21 7:28 am, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Am Di., 21. Dez. 2021 um 07:08 Uhr schrieb François Dumont via
Libstdc++ :
Hi
Is there a chance for this patch to be integrated for next gcc
release ?
François
No counterargument for the acceptance, but: Shouldn't
__small_size_threshold() be
Am Di., 21. Dez. 2021 um 07:08 Uhr schrieb François Dumont via
Libstdc++ :
>
> Hi
>
> Is there a chance for this patch to be integrated for next gcc
> release ?
>
> François
>
No counterargument for the acceptance, but: Shouldn't
__small_size_threshold() be a noexcept function?
- Daniel
Hi
Is there a chance for this patch to be integrated for next gcc
release ?
François
On 23/09/21 6:36 am, François Dumont wrote:
Ping ?
On 16/08/21 9:03 pm, François Dumont wrote:
On 17/07/20 2:58 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/11/19 22:31 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
This is
Ping ?
On 16/08/21 9:03 pm, François Dumont wrote:
On 17/07/20 2:58 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/11/19 22:31 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
This is an implementation of PR 68303.
I try to use this idea as much as possible to avoid computation of
hash codes.
Note that tests are not
On 17/07/20 2:58 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/11/19 22:31 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
This is an implementation of PR 68303.
I try to use this idea as much as possible to avoid computation of
hash codes.
Note that tests are not showing any gain. I guess hash computation
must be
On 17/11/19 22:31 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
This is an implementation of PR 68303.
I try to use this idea as much as possible to avoid computation of
hash codes.
Note that tests are not showing any gain. I guess hash computation
must be quite bad to get a benefit from it. So I am only
This is an implementation of PR 68303.
I try to use this idea as much as possible to avoid computation of hash
codes.
Note that tests are not showing any gain. I guess hash computation must
be quite bad to get a benefit from it. So I am only activating it when
hash code is not cached and/or
10 matches
Mail list logo
