> On 17 Dec 2021, at 16:17, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
>> In this instance, it's simple enough to be quoted directly:
>
> You may want to look into git send-email :-)
Eh, indeed.
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97142.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97142.c
>>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:04:19PM +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> > On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:58, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > Please use p7 instead of p9.
>
> Sure.
>
> > Also, you attached some binary, so I cannot reply to it easily.
>
> Ah, sorry. I did remember you told me this in the
> On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:58, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> Please use p7 instead of p9.
Sure.
> Also, you attached some binary, so I cannot reply to it easily.
Ah, sorry. I did remember you told me this in the past
and renamed the file .diff to
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:43:32PM +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> gcc.target/powerpc/pr97142.c scans the output assembly
> for specific instructions which our toolchain configured
> to default to -mcpu=604 doesn't produce.
>
> The PR refers to a power9 configuration for the original
Hello,
gcc.target/powerpc/pr97142.c scans the output assembly
for specific instructions which our toolchain configured
to default to -mcpu=604 doesn't produce.
The PR refers to a power9 configuration for the original
report, so the attached patch is a suggestion to add a
-mdejagnu-cpu=power9 to
