Re: [PATCH] Arm: Fix incorrect tailcall-generation for indirect calls [PR113780]

2024-02-15 Thread Tejas Belagod
On 2/14/24 3:55 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 14/02/2024 09:20, Tejas Belagod wrote: On 2/7/24 11:41 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote: This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions to be tailcalled incorrectly

Re: [PATCH] Arm: Fix incorrect tailcall-generation for indirect calls [PR113780]

2024-02-14 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 14/02/2024 09:20, Tejas Belagod wrote: > On 2/7/24 11:41 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote: >>> This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions >>> to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used.

Re: [PATCH] Arm: Fix incorrect tailcall-generation for indirect calls [PR113780]

2024-02-14 Thread Tejas Belagod
On 2/7/24 11:41 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote: This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used. Tested on arm-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main. OK for

Re: [PATCH] Arm: Fix incorrect tailcall-generation for indirect calls [PR113780]

2024-02-07 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote: > This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions > to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used. > > Tested on arm-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main. OK for trunk? > > 2024-02-07 Tejas Belagod > >

[PATCH] Arm: Fix incorrect tailcall-generation for indirect calls [PR113780]

2024-02-06 Thread Tejas Belagod
This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used. Tested on arm-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main. OK for trunk? 2024-02-07 Tejas Belagod PR target/113780 * gcc/config/arm.cc