> On 25 Jan 2022, at 15:27, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> This patch broke bootstrap on AIX. It may have broken Darwin.
As you anticipated, it did : fixed as below (tested on powerpc-darwin9,
pushed to master).
thanks
Iain
[pushed] Darwin, PPC: Fix bootstrap after GLIBC version changes.
A
This patch broke bootstrap on AIX. It may have broken Darwin. I have
applied the following patch. AIX doesn't need to distinguish between
different Linux libc implementations.
Bootstrapped on powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.3.0
Thanks, David
aix: AIX is not GLIBC.
A recent patch added tests for
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 07:03:48PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 01:16:38PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > Actually, I suspect we either need something like following patch,
> > > or need
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 07:03:48PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 01:16:38PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Actually, I suspect we either need something like following patch,
> > or need to change
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:06:24AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > 2022-01-22 Jakub Jelinek
> >
> > * config/linux.h (OPTION_GLIBC_P, OPTION_UCLIBC_P,
> > OPTION_BIONIC_P, OPTION_MUSL_P): Define.
> > (OPTION_GLIBC, OPTION_UCLIBC, OPTION_BIONIC, OPTION_MUSL): Redefine
> >
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:04 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 01:16:38PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Actually, I suspect we either need something like following patch,
> > or need to change gcc/config/{linux,rs6000/linux{,64},alpha/linux}.h
>
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 01:16:38PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Actually, I suspect we either need something like following patch,
> or need to change gcc/config/{linux,rs6000/linux{,64},alpha/linux}.h
> so that next to those OPTION_GLIBC etc. macros it also defines versions
> of
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:32:21AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> I've just noticed the patch broke a few cross compilers:
>
> s390x-ibm-tpf:
>
> /home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc:
> In function ‘bool s390_supports_split_stack(bool,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:32:21AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've just noticed the patch broke a few cross compilers:
>
> s390x-ibm-tpf:
>
> /home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc:
> In function ‘bool
Hello.
I've just noticed the patch broke a few cross compilers:
s390x-ibm-tpf:
/home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc:
In function ‘bool s390_supports_split_stack(bool, gcc_options*)’:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 3:13 AM Sören Tempel wrote:
>
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > I think it should check OPTION_MUSL at runtime instead of
> > TARGET_GLIBC_MAJOR at compile time.
> > or rather opts->x_linux_libc == LIBC_MUSL
> > The others should be done similarly too.
>
> Thanks for pointing
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I think it should check OPTION_MUSL at runtime instead of
> TARGET_GLIBC_MAJOR at compile time.
> or rather opts->x_linux_libc == LIBC_MUSL
> The others should be done similarly too.
Thanks for pointing this out, I wasn't aware of OPTION_MUSL and
OPTION_GLIBC. However, I
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 2:44 AM soeren--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Sören Tempel
>
> The -fsplit-stack option requires the pthread_t TCB definition in the
> libc to provide certain struct fields at specific hardcoded offsets. As
> far as I know, only glibc provides these fields at the
From: Sören Tempel
The -fsplit-stack option requires the pthread_t TCB definition in the
libc to provide certain struct fields at specific hardcoded offsets. As
far as I know, only glibc provides these fields at the required offsets.
Most notably, musl libc does not have these fields. However,
14 matches
Mail list logo
