ichard Sandiford
Date: 2022-12-28 19:47
To: Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; Jeff Law; kito.cheng\@gmail.com; palmer\@dabbelt.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix ICE of visiting non-existing block in CFG.
Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes:
> On 12/27/22 16:11, juzhe.zhong wrote:
>
Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes:
> On 12/27/22 16:11, juzhe.zhong wrote:
>> You mean only change to this form you suggested in this patch？ Since in
>> all other places of this PASS，I use RTL_SSA framework to iterate
>> instructions and blocks. I use RTL_SSA framework to iterate blocks here
>>
Hi, I fixed that form like you said:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/609217.html
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2022-12-28 09:11
To: 钟居哲
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix ICE of visiting non-existing block in CFG
oops, I just committed this yesterday, anyway, I think we can always
have further patches to improve that.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 9:12 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/27/22 17:24, 钟居哲 wrote:
> > OK, I will change that after I finished my current work.
> Sounds good. Thanks.
>
On 12/27/22 17:24, 钟居哲 wrote:
OK, I will change that after I finished my current work.
Sounds good. Thanks.
Jeff
OK, I will change that after I finished my current work.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2022-12-28 08:06
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; kito.ch...@gmail.com; pal...@dabbelt.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix ICE of visiting non-existing block in CFG.
On 12/27/22
On 12/27/22 16:11, juzhe.zhong wrote:
You mean only change to this form you suggested in this patch？ Since in
all other places of this PASS，I use RTL_SSA framework to iterate
instructions and blocks. I use RTL_SSA framework to iterate blocks here
to make codes look more consistent even
On 12/23/22 20:08, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
This patch is to fix issue of visiting non-existing block of CFG.
Since blocks index of CFG in GCC are not always contiguous, we will potentially
visit a gap block which is no existing in the current CFG.
This patch can
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
This patch is to fix issue of visiting non-existing block of CFG.
Since blocks index of CFG in GCC are not always contiguous, we will potentially
visit a gap block which is no existing in the current CFG.
This patch can avoid visiting non existing block in CFG.
I noticed
