Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Introduce option -mrvv-autovec-max-lmul for RVV autovec

he.zh...@rivai.ai From: Robin Dapp Date: 2024-03-14 18:59 To: 钟居哲; demin.han; gcc-patches CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; Li, Pan2; jeffreyalaw Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Introduce option -mrvv-autovec-max-lmul for RVV autovec Should it really be called autovec-max-lmul? We also use TARGET_MAX_LM

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Introduce option -mrvv-autovec-max-lmul for RVV autovec

Should it really be called autovec-max-lmul? We also use TARGET_MAX_LMUL for builtins etc. Or are we just following LLVM's naming here? Isn't -mrvv-max-lmul sufficient? > PR target/112648 This PR is not really resolved or affected by the