Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-05-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:42 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > On 5/2/22 02:30, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:22 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > >> > >> Andrew was mumbling something about a fast ranger mode for this > >> release that should be on par with legacy evrp. IIRC it would

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-05-09 Thread Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
On 5/2/22 02:30, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:22 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote: Andrew was mumbling something about a fast ranger mode for this release that should be on par with legacy evrp. IIRC it would be purely DOM based, won't visit back edges, and there's no caching. But

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-05-02 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:30 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:22 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:13 PM Richard Biener > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:53 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:09 AM

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-05-02 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:22 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:13 PM Richard Biener > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:53 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:09 AM Richard Biener > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:44

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-29 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:13 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:53 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:09 AM Richard Biener > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:44 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-29 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:43 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 4/28/2022 10:30 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > [Jeff, this is the same patch I sent you last week with minor tweaks > > to the commit message.] > And I just dropped it into the tester. We should have the vast majority > of targets tested

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-29 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:53 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:09 AM Richard Biener > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:44 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/28/2022 10:30 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > > [Jeff, this is the same

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-29 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:09 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:44 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4/28/2022 10:30 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > [Jeff, this is the same patch I sent you last week with minor tweaks > > > to the commit message.] > >

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-29 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:44 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > On 4/28/2022 10:30 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > [Jeff, this is the same patch I sent you last week with minor tweaks > > to the commit message.] > And I just dropped it into the tester. We should have the vast majority > of

Re: [PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-28 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 4/28/2022 10:30 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: [Jeff, this is the same patch I sent you last week with minor tweaks to the commit message.] And I just dropped it into the tester.  We should have the vast majority of targets tested by this time tomorrow. [Despite the verbosity of the

[PATCH] Replace EVRP in DOM with ranger.

2022-04-28 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
[Jeff, this is the same patch I sent you last week with minor tweaks to the commit message.] [Despite the verbosity of the message, this is actually a pretty straightforward patch. It should've gone in last cycle, but there was a nagging regression I couldn't get to until after stage1 had