On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:03:50PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > + if (code == COMPLEX_TYPE)
> > + {
> > + if (TREE_CODE (*valp) == COMPLEX_CST)
> > + *valp = build2 (COMPLEX_EXPR, type, TREE_REALPART (*valp),
> > + TREE_IMAGPART (*valp));
> > + else if
On 6/17/22 13:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 09:57:06PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:27:28PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Doesn't this assert mean that complex_expr will always be == valp?
No, even when handling the pushed
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 09:57:06PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:27:28PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Doesn't this assert mean that complex_expr will always be == valp?
>
> No, even when handling the pushed *PART_EXPR, it will set
> valp = _OPERAND
