On 10/28/21 08:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:01:27AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
--- gcc/cp/semantics.c.jj 2021-10-27 09:16:41.161600606 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/semantics.c 2021-10-28 13:06:59.325791588 +0200
@@ -3079,6 +3079,24 @@ finish_unary_op_expr (location_t op_loc,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:01:27AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/semantics.c.jj 2021-10-27 09:16:41.161600606 +0200
> > +++ gcc/cp/semantics.c 2021-10-28 13:06:59.325791588 +0200
> > @@ -3079,6 +3079,24 @@ finish_unary_op_expr (location_t op_loc,
> > return result;
> > }
On 10/28/21 07:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 04:58:53PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/21/21 04:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
Here is an attempt to implement DR2351 - void{} - where void{} after
pack expansion is considered valid and the same thing as void().
For
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 04:58:53PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/21/21 04:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Here is an attempt to implement DR2351 - void{} - where void{} after
> > pack expansion is considered valid and the same thing as void().
> > For templates, dunno if we have
