On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:13 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 4/30/24 12:04, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:54 AM Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/20/24 19:06, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>> After r7-987-gf17a223de829cb, the access for the elements of a vector
> >>> type would
On 4/30/24 12:04, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:54 AM Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/20/24 19:06, Andrew Pinski wrote:
After r7-987-gf17a223de829cb, the access for the elements of a vector type
would lose the qualifiers.
So if we had `constvector[0]`, the type of the element of
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:54 AM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 2/20/24 19:06, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > After r7-987-gf17a223de829cb, the access for the elements of a vector type
> > would lose the qualifiers.
> > So if we had `constvector[0]`, the type of the element of the array would
> > not
On 2/20/24 19:06, Andrew Pinski wrote:
After r7-987-gf17a223de829cb, the access for the elements of a vector type
would lose the qualifiers.
So if we had `constvector[0]`, the type of the element of the array would not
have const on it.
This was due to a missing build_qualified_type for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Pinski (QUIC)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 7:06 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Andrew Pinski (QUIC)
> Subject: [PATCH] c++/c-common: Fix convert_vector_to_array_for_subscript
> for qualified vector types [PR892
After r7-987-gf17a223de829cb, the access for the elements of a vector type
would lose the qualifiers.
So if we had `constvector[0]`, the type of the element of the array would not
have const on it.
This was due to a missing build_qualified_type for the inner type of the vector
when building the
