On 5/13/24 06:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 03:59:25PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
2024-05-09 Jakub Jelinek
Jason Merrill
PR lto/113208
* cp-tree.h (maybe_optimize_cdtor): Remove.
* decl2.cc (tentative_decl_linkage): Call
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 03:59:25PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > 2024-05-09 Jakub Jelinek
> > Jason Merrill
> >
> > PR lto/113208
> > * cp-tree.h (maybe_optimize_cdtor): Remove.
> > * decl2.cc (tentative_decl_linkage): Call maybe_make_one_only
> > for implicit
On 5/9/24 14:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:30:48AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Hmm, maybe maybe_clone_body shouldn't clear DECL_SAVED_TREE for aliases, but
rather set it to some stub like void_node?
Though with all these changes, it's probably better to go with your first
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 02:58:52PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 08:20:00PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/decl.cc.jj 2024-05-09 10:30:54.804505130 +0200
> > +++ gcc/cp/decl.cc 2024-05-09 17:07:08.400110018 +0200
> > @@ -19280,6 +19280,14 @@
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 08:20:00PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> --- gcc/cp/decl.cc.jj 2024-05-09 10:30:54.804505130 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/decl.cc2024-05-09 17:07:08.400110018 +0200
> @@ -19280,6 +19280,14 @@ cxx_comdat_group (tree decl)
> else
> break;
> }
> + /* If
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:30:48AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Hmm, maybe maybe_clone_body shouldn't clear DECL_SAVED_TREE for aliases, but
> rather set it to some stub like void_node?
>
> Though with all these changes, it's probably better to go with your first
> patch for GCC 14 and delay
