Re: [PATCH] c++: paren aggr CTAD with base classes [PR115114]

On 5/16/24 11:32, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps 14? OK for both. -- >8 -- We're accidentally ignoring base classes during parenthesized aggregate CTAD because the TYPE_FIELDS of a template type doesn't contain

[PATCH] c++: paren aggr CTAD with base classes [PR115114]

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps 14? -- >8 -- We're accidentally ignoring base classes during parenthesized aggregate CTAD because the TYPE_FIELDS of a template type doesn't contain bases, so we need to consider them separately.