On 12/22/22 12:34, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/15/22 14:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/12/22 12:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
When instantiating a constrained hidden
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/15/22 14:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 12/12/22 12:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > > When instantiating a constrained hidden template
On 12/15/22 14:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/12/22 12:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
When instantiating a constrained hidden template friend, we need to
substitute into its constraints for sake of declaration
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > On 12/12/22 12:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > When instantiating a constrained hidden template friend, we need to
> > > substitute into its constraints for sake of declaration matching.
> >
> > Hmm, we
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/12/22 12:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > When instantiating a constrained hidden template friend, we need to
> > substitute into its constraints for sake of declaration matching.
>
> Hmm, we shouldn't need to do declaration matching when there's
On 12/12/22 12:20, Patrick Palka wrote:
When instantiating a constrained hidden template friend, we need to
substitute into its constraints for sake of declaration matching.
Hmm, we shouldn't need to do declaration matching when there's only a
single declaration.
For
this substitution we
When instantiating a constrained hidden template friend, we need to
substitute into its constraints for sake of declaration matching. For
this substitution we use a full argument vector whose outer levels
correspond to the class's arguments and innermost level corresponds to
the template's
