Re: [PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr, cont [PR114393]

On 4/12/24 09:47, Patrick Palka wrote: The original PR114393 testcase is unfortunately still not accepted after r14-9938-g081c1e93d56d35 due to return type deduction confusion when a lambda-expr is used as a default template argument. The below reduced testcase demonstrates the bug. Here,

[PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr, cont [PR114393]

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- The original PR114393 testcase is unfortunately still not accepted after r14-9938-g081c1e93d56d35 due to return type deduction confusion when a lambda-expr is used as a default template argument. The below