On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:34 AM Vit Kabele wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:05:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000..e8f1044a36b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +/* {
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:05:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..e8f1044a36b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-Wpadded" } */
> > +
> > +/*
>
ite the test properly formatted
> (i.e. not on a single line), please let me know.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] c: Extend the -Wpadded message with actual padding size
>
> When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
> now also informs the us
t;8 --
Subject: [PATCH] c: Extend the -Wpadded message with actual padding size
When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to
be added to get rid of the warning.
This removes the need of using pah
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:37:32PM +0200, Vit Kabele wrote:
> When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
> now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to
> be added to get rid of the warning.
>
> This removes the need of using pahole or similar
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 3:37 PM Vit Kabele wrote:
>
> When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
> now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to
> be added to get rid of the warning.
Hi, thanks for taking the time to improve -Wpadded; I have
When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to
be added to get rid of the warning.
This removes the need of using pahole or similar tools, or manually
determining the padding size.
Tested on
