On 6/1/22 17:14, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/2022 1:14 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Right now, when a \$x escape sequence occures, the
>> next character after $x is skipped, which is bogus.
>>
>> The code has very low coverage right now.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on
On 5/4/2022 1:14 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Right now, when a \$x escape sequence occures, the
next character after $x is skipped, which is bogus.
The code has very low coverage right now.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
PING^1
On 5/5/22 09:55, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/4/22 21:38, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4 May 2022, at 20:14, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> Right now, when a \$x escape sequence occures, the
>>> next character after $x is skipped, which is bogus.
>>>
>>> The code has very low coverage right
On 5/4/22 21:38, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>> On 4 May 2022, at 20:14, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> Right now, when a \$x escape sequence occures, the
>> next character after $x is skipped, which is bogus.
>>
>> The code has very low coverage right now.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu
> On 4 May 2022, at 20:14, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Right now, when a \$x escape sequence occures, the
> next character after $x is skipped, which is bogus.
>
> The code has very low coverage right now.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to
Right now, when a \$x escape sequence occures, the
next character after $x is skipped, which is bogus.
The code has very low coverage right now.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
*
