On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 5:10 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 12/10/21 10:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > The function comment for adjust_field_tree_exp says this special case
> > is for handling trees whose operands may contain pointers to RTL instead
> > of to trees. But ever since r0-59671, which
On 12/10/21 10:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
The function comment for adjust_field_tree_exp says this special case
is for handling trees whose operands may contain pointers to RTL instead
of to trees. But ever since r0-59671, which fixed/removed the last two
tree codes for which this was possible
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:57 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/10/2021 8:41 AM, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > The function comment for adjust_field_tree_exp says this special case
> > is for handling trees whose operands may contain pointers to RTL instead
> > of to trees. But ever
On 12/10/2021 8:41 AM, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote:
The function comment for adjust_field_tree_exp says this special case
is for handling trees whose operands may contain pointers to RTL instead
of to trees. But ever since r0-59671, which fixed/removed the last two
tree codes for
The function comment for adjust_field_tree_exp says this special case
is for handling trees whose operands may contain pointers to RTL instead
of to trees. But ever since r0-59671, which fixed/removed the last two
tree codes for which this was possible (GOTO_SUBROUTINE_EXPR and
