On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 11:12 AM Mike Stump wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2024, at 10:07 AM, FX Coudert wrote:
> >
> > The new testcase gcc.target/i386/asm-raw-symbol.c fails on darwin. This is
> > partly because symbols are prefixed with underscore, and also because the
> > order of operands in the
On Feb 10, 2024, at 10:07 AM, FX Coudert wrote:
>
> The new testcase gcc.target/i386/asm-raw-symbol.c fails on darwin. This is
> partly because symbols are prefixed with underscore, and also because the
> order of operands in the addition is reversed (but I think it’s valid still).
> The code
The new testcase gcc.target/i386/asm-raw-symbol.c fails on darwin. This is
partly because symbols are prefixed with underscore, and also because the order
of operands in the addition is reversed (but I think it’s valid still). The
code generated is this:
_func:
LFB0:
pushq %rbp
