> From: Patrick Palka
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:48:26 -0500
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and release
> branches (r14-205 was backported everywhere)?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> The adjustment to max_size_type.cc in r14-205-g83470a5cd4c3d2
> inadvertently increased the
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024, 17:49 Patrick Palka, wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and release
> branches (r14-205 was backported everywhere)?
>
Yes, thanks.
> -- >8 --
>
> The adjustment to max_size_type.cc in r14-205-g83470a5cd4c3d2
> inadvertently increased the
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and release
branches (r14-205 was backported everywhere)?
-- >8 --
The adjustment to max_size_type.cc in r14-205-g83470a5cd4c3d2
inadvertently increased the execution time of the test by over 5x due to
enabling the two main loops to
