Hi,
I would like to have a ping.
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> For PowerPC, some INT mode and FLOAT modes can be marked as tieable,
> for example: DI<->DF.
> One note SFmode is special, it would only tieable with itself.
>
> I updated previous patch more reasonable:
>
Hi,
For PowerPC, some INT mode and FLOAT modes can be marked as tieable,
for example: DI<->DF.
One note SFmode is special, it would only tieable with itself.
I updated previous patch more reasonable:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609504.html
Bootstrap and regtest pass
Gentle ping...
Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would ping this patch for stage1:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609504.html
>
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu)
>
> Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gently Ping:
>>
Hi,
I would ping this patch for stage1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609504.html
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches writes:
> Hi,
>
> Gently Ping:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609504.html
>
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu)
>
>
> Jiufu Guo
Hi,
Gently Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609504.html
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> During discussing/review patches in maillist, we find more modes are
> tieable, e.g. DI<->DF. With some discussion, I drafted this patch
> to mark more tieable
Hi,
During discussing/review patches in maillist, we find more modes are
tieable, e.g. DI<->DF. With some discussion, I drafted this patch
to mark more tieable modes.
Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
Is this ok for trunk?
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
gcc/ChangeLog:
*