On Fri, 3 Nov 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>
> On 03/11/2023 07:31, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > I do wonder about the gfortran testsuite adjustments though.
> >
> > !GCC$ builtin (sin) attributes simd (inbranch)
> >
> >! this should not be using simd clone
> >
On 03/11/2023 07:31, Richard Biener wrote:
OK.
I do wonder about the gfortran testsuite adjustments though.
!GCC$ builtin (sin) attributes simd (inbranch)
! this should not be using simd clone
y4 = sin(x8)
previously we wouldn't vectorize this as no notinbranch simd function
is
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In a previous patch I did most of the work for this, but forgot to change the
> check for number of arguments matching between call and simdclone. This check
> should accept calls without a mask to be matched against simdclones with mask
Hi,
In a previous patch I did most of the work for this, but forgot to
change the check for number of arguments matching between call and
simdclone. This check should accept calls without a mask to be matched
against simdclones with mask arguments. I also added tests to verify
this feature
