Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Firstly, these bullet points are full sentences and so should end with
> a period (or smiley, in some cases).
>
> Secondly, releases are not issued by the GNU Project at all, they're
> issued by the GCC release managers.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 18:30, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 7/27/21 9:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Should we make this change?
> >
> > Firstly, these bullet points are full sentences and so should end with
> > a period (or smiley, in some cases).
>
> I'd expect that to be
On Jul 27, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On 7/27/21 9:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Secondly, releases are not issued by the GNU Project at all, they're
>> issued by the GCC release managers.
>
> I (and I suspect most users unfamiliar with the inner
On 7/27/21 9:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
Should we make this change?
Firstly, these bullet points are full sentences and so should end with
a period (or smiley, in some cases).
I'd expect that to be relatively uncontroversial ;)
Secondly, releases are not issued by the
Should we make this change?
Firstly, these bullet points are full sentences and so should end with
a period (or smiley, in some cases).
Secondly, releases are not issued by the GNU Project at all, they're
issued by the GCC release managers.
Finally, "releases or snapshots of GCC not issued by
