Re: [PATCH 2/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in

2024-05-24 Thread Carl Love
Kewen: On 5/14/24 01:43, Kewen.Lin wrote: > Hi, > > on 2024/4/20 05:17, Carl Love wrote: >> rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in >> >> The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed >> built-in that is documented in the PVIPR. The __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws >>

Re: [PATCH 2/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in

2024-05-14 Thread Kewen.Lin
Hi, on 2024/4/20 05:17, Carl Love wrote: > rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in > > The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed > built-in that is documented in the PVIPR. The __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws > built-in is not documented and there are no test

[PATCH 2/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in

2024-04-19 Thread Carl Love
rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed built-in that is documented in the PVIPR. The __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in is not documented and there are no test cases for it. This patch removes the redundant