ping?
libcpp maintainers, is the helper in incpath.* ok?
fortraners,
Do you prefer a rogue, local forward declaration, or is the
introduction of that trivial wrapper ok? I don't think pulling in cpp.h
from f95-lang.cc is desirable, but i can do that if you all think
that's preferred.
On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 20:22:53 +0100
Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
> I cannot comment on the gcc/ parts, but
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/cpp.c b/gcc/fortran/cpp.c
> > index e86386c8b17..04fe8fe460b 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fortran/cpp.c
> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/cpp.c
> > @@ -728,12 +728,20
Hi Bernhard,
I cannot comment on the gcc/ parts, but
Am 05.11.21 um 22:17 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches:
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/68800
* cpp.h (gfc_cpp_free_cpp_dirs): New declaration.
* cpp.c
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/68800
* cpp.h (gfc_cpp_free_cpp_dirs): New declaration.
* cpp.c (gfc_cpp_free_cpp_dirs): New definition.
(gfc_cpp_add_include_path, gfc_cpp_add_include_path_after): Add
comment.
*
