On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 02:40, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> Thanks, this is what I'm pushing:
>
Great.
I wonder if we should move the contents of libstdc++fs.a and
libstdc++_libbacktrace.a into libstdc++exp.a and make the former libraries
into linker scripts that point to libstdc++exp.a
It would
On 11/18/22 13:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/11/22 15:57 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch adds the library support for the experimental C++ Contracts
implementation. This now consists only of a default definition of the
violation
On 03/11/22 15:57 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch adds the library support for the experimental C++ Contracts
implementation. This now consists only of a default definition of the
violation handler, which users can override through
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch adds the library support for the experimental C++ Contracts
implementation. This now consists only of a default definition of the
violation handler, which users can override through defining their own
version. To avoid ABI
