Re: Ping: [PATCH v2 2/2] testsuite: Replace many dg-require-thread-fence with dg-require-atomic-cmpxchg-word

LGTM but I'm not a maintainer ;-) On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Ping. > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:08:16 +0200 > > > > s/atomic-exchange/atomic-cmpxchg-word/g. > > Tested as v1. > > > > Ok to commit? > > -- >8 -- > > These tests

Ping: [PATCH v2 2/2] testsuite: Replace many dg-require-thread-fence with dg-require-atomic-cmpxchg-word

Ping. > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:08:16 +0200 > > s/atomic-exchange/atomic-cmpxchg-word/g. > Tested as v1. > > Ok to commit? > -- >8 -- > These tests actually use a form of atomic compare and exchange > operation, not just atomic loading and storing. Some targets

[PATCH v2 2/2] testsuite: Replace many dg-require-thread-fence with dg-require-atomic-cmpxchg-word

s/atomic-exchange/atomic-cmpxchg-word/g. Tested as v1. Ok to commit? -- >8 -- These tests actually use a form of atomic compare and exchange operation, not just atomic loading and storing. Some targets (not supported by e.g. libatomic) have atomic loading and storing, but not compare and