Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops

2024-01-31 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> From: Richard Earnshaw (lists) > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:36 AM > To: Andre Simoes Dias Vieira; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov; Stam Markianos-Wright > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low > Overhead

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops

2024-01-30 Thread Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops On 19/01/2024 14:40, Andre Vieira wrote: > > Respin after comments from Kyrill and rebase. I also removed an if-then-else > construct in arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems similar to the other &g

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops

2024-01-30 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 19/01/2024 14:40, Andre Vieira wrote: > > Respin after comments from Kyrill and rebase. I also removed an if-then-else > construct in arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems similar to the other > functions > Kyrill pointed out. > > After an earlier comment from Richard Sandiford I also added

[PATCH v3 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops

2024-01-19 Thread Andre Vieira
Respin after comments from Kyrill and rebase. I also removed an if-then-else construct in arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems similar to the other functions Kyrill pointed out. After an earlier comment from Richard Sandiford I also added comments to the two tail predication patterns added to