On 12/9/21 3:58 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:21 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
There are some other "unusual" cases worth a look, such as missing
context of any kind except for like and column:
elfnn-riscv.c:3346:7:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:21 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> There are some other "unusual" cases worth a look, such as missing
> context of any kind except for like and column:
>
> elfnn-riscv.c:3346:7: warning: statement after return is not reachable
>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/26/21 5:18 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This implements a subset of -Wunreachable-code, unreachable code
> > after a return stmt. Contrary to the previous attemt at CFG
> > construction time this implements the bits during GIMPLE
On 11/26/21 5:18 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
This implements a subset of -Wunreachable-code, unreachable code
after a return stmt. Contrary to the previous attemt at CFG
construction time this implements the bits during GIMPLE lowering
where there are still all GIMPLE return stmts
On 11/26/2021 5:18 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
This implements a subset of -Wunreachable-code, unreachable code
after a return stmt. Contrary to the previous attemt at CFG
construction time this implements the bits during GIMPLE lowering
where there are still all GIMPLE return
This implements a subset of -Wunreachable-code, unreachable code
after a return stmt. Contrary to the previous attemt at CFG
construction time this implements the bits during GIMPLE lowering
where there are still all GIMPLE return stmts in the IL.
The lowering phase keeps track of whether stmts
