Ping.
On 20 December 2013 20:46, Michael V. Zolotukhin
michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch seems to make rather too many assumptions about host and
target compilers. Certainly code like this can't go into
target-independent code like lto-wrapper.
That's true. The point of this
On 12/17/2013 12:42 PM, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
Hi everybody,
Here is a patch 3/3: Add invocation of target compiler.
+ /* Run objcopy on TARGET_IMAGE_FILE_NAME. */
+ buf1 = (char*) xmalloc (strlen (.data=.)
+ + strlen (OFFLOAD_IMAGE_SECTION_NAME) + 1);
+ if
This patch seems to make rather too many assumptions about host and
target compilers. Certainly code like this can't go into
target-independent code like lto-wrapper.
That's true. The point of this patch was to show what is needed to support
x86-MIC OpenMP offloading, as we currently see it.
Hi everybody,
Here is a patch 3/3: Add invocation of target compiler.
With this patch lto-wrapper performs invocation of target compilers and embeds
the resultant target images into the host binary. The targets and the
corresponding compilers are supposed to be specified in a special
