On Tue, 8 Aug 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
> > I wonder however why do we need so much more code, including the middle
> > end too, to support this ISA extension than we do for the very same set of
> > MIPSr6 instructions under ISA_HAS_SEL, hmm...
> Because it doesn't handle as many cases as we're
On 8/8/23 15:52, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
It's also something I kept meaning to resolve and your submission just gave me
the proper motivation to move zicond forward. The target specific bits you
did lined up perfectly with the community
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> It's also something I kept meaning to resolve and your submission just gave me
> the proper motivation to move zicond forward. The target specific bits you
> did lined up perfectly with the community feedback on the original VRULL
>
On 8/4/23 03:29, Xiao Zeng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 01:20:00 AM Jeff Law wrote:
In the wrong two optimization modes, I only considered the
case of satisfying the ELSE branch, but in fact, like the correct
two optimization modes, I should consider the case of satisfying
both the
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 01:20:00 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
>So we're being a bit too aggressive with the .opt zicond patterns.
>
>
>> (define_insn "*czero.eqz..opt1"
>> [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>> (if_then_else:GPR (eq (match_operand:X 1
1 != 0) ? op1 : op2 which
obviously doesn't match to any zicond instruction as op1 is selected
when it is not zero.
So two of the patterns are just totally bogus as they are not
implementable with zicond. They are removed. The asm template for the
.opt3 pattern is fixed to use czero.nez and its name is changed to
