Excerpts from Andrew Pinski's message of März 3, 2024 11:49 pm:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 5:51 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes a wrong code issue in the D front-end where lowered
>> struct comparisons would reinterpret fields with a different (usually
>> bigger) alignment
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 5:51 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes a wrong code issue in the D front-end where lowered
> struct comparisons would reinterpret fields with a different (usually
> bigger) alignment than the original. Use `build_aligned_type' to
> preserve the alignment
Excerpts from Richard Biener's message of März 3, 2024 11:41 am:
>
>
>> Am 03.03.2024 um 02:51 schrieb Iain Buclaw :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes a wrong code issue in the D front-end where lowered
>> struct comparisons would reinterpret fields with a different (usually
>> bigger)
> Am 03.03.2024 um 02:51 schrieb Iain Buclaw :
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes a wrong code issue in the D front-end where lowered
> struct comparisons would reinterpret fields with a different (usually
> bigger) alignment than the original. Use `build_aligned_type' to
> preserve the alignment
Hi,
This patch fixes a wrong code issue in the D front-end where lowered
struct comparisons would reinterpret fields with a different (usually
bigger) alignment than the original. Use `build_aligned_type' to
preserve the alignment when casting away for such comparisons.
Bootstrapped and
