Re: [pr/63582] Don't even store __int128 types if not supported.

2014-10-27 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, DJ Delorie wrote: Fixed PR/63582. Tested with no regressions on x86-64 and ix86. Ok? * tree.c (build_common_tree_nodes): Don't even store the __int128 types if they're not supported. OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: [pr/63582] Don't even store __int128 types if not supported.

2014-10-27 Thread DJ Delorie
Fixed PR/63582. Tested with no regressions on x86-64 and ix86. Ok? * tree.c (build_common_tree_nodes): Don't even store the __int128 types if they're not supported. OK. Thanks! Committed.

[pr/63582] Don't even store __int128 types if not supported.

2014-10-24 Thread DJ Delorie
Fixed PR/63582. Tested with no regressions on x86-64 and ix86. Ok? * tree.c (build_common_tree_nodes): Don't even store the __int128 types if they're not supported. Index: tree.c === --- tree.c (revision