Regressions on master at commit r14-9692 vs commit r14-9682 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9692 vs commit r14-9682 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

Regressions on master at commit r14-9696 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/i686

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9696 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/i686 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5

Regressions on master at commit r14-9696 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/i686

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9696 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/i686 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5

[r14-9692 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c scan-assembler-times \txor[ql]\t 2 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread haochen.jiang via Gcc-regression
On Linux/x86_64, 839bc42772ba7af66af3bd16efed4a69511312ae is the first bad commit commit 839bc42772ba7af66af3bd16efed4a69511312ae Author: Segher Boessenkool Date: Wed Mar 27 14:09:52 2024 + combine: Don't combine if I2 does not change caused FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c

Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9696 vs commit r14-9692 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9696 vs commit r14-9692 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5 FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t

Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9692 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9692 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

Regressions under Intel SDE on native/master at commit r14-9692 vs commit r14-9687 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-regression
New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/apx-ndd-tls-1b.c scan-assembler-times addq[ \t]+%r[a-z0-9]+, a@gottpoff\\(%rip\\), %r[a-z0-9]+ 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c scan-assembler-times \txor[ql]\t 2 New passes: To reproduce the test failures: $ cd gcc $ make check

Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL:

Regressions on master at commit r14-9682 vs commit r14-9671 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9682 vs commit r14-9671 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5 FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5

Regressions on master at commit r14-9682 vs commit r14-9661 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9682 vs commit r14-9661 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5 FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c scan-assembler-times .4byte[\t ][a-e][\t ]+[^\n]*bts_offset 5

Regressions on master at commit r14-9671 vs commit r14-9654 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9671 vs commit r14-9654 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O0 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O0 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c -O0 execution test FAIL:

Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/i686

2024-03-27 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: ctestzstd New passes:

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-27 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8500 vs commit r13-8496 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New