On Aug 4, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Which symbol is first in the file depends on the order you added the symbols
to the schematic. So, depending on your habits, the problem will show
sometimes, always, or never. This is a bug(*) known for years.
Indeed. We all agree this is
Tamas Szabo sza2k...@freemail.hu writes:
I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots
of them with multiplexed functions.
1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
+ easily fit to the schematic, 4x16 pin
+ easy to create the symbol
- no functional
Tamas Szabo sza2k...@freemail.hu writes:
I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots
of them with multiplexed functions.
1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
[snip]
2. I can separate pins by functions, without keeping the pins' order:
[snip]
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Option 3.) I'd make a symbol for each function the chip supports,
and instantiate a subset of those that I need, carefully annotating
overlaps in pin usage, so that no pin is used twice accidentally. This
is required work for using such a chip anyway.
Note, that
On 08/04/2010 05:54 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
c) Rearrange the order of symbols in the file with a text editor.
Downside: laborious.
I know this sounds a silly idea, and I never found similar in any
schematic editor, but wouldn't it be possible to move pins dynamically
on the edge of the
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tamas Szabo sza2k...@freemail.hu wrote:
I know this sounds a silly idea, and I never found similar in any schematic
editor, but wouldn't it be possible to move pins dynamically on the edge of
the device in gschem as simply as moving any other attribute like
Kevin Vermeer wrote:
kaimartin, are you saying that simply swapping the positions (just the
Y components, even) of a pin on a symbol will cause gnetlist to break?
No. I Am talking about the position in the *.sch file. Not about the
position inside the symbol.
It's a completely different
Hi,
I would create a schematic symbol for AT91SAM7 device: 64 pins, lots of
them with multiplexed functions.
1. I can number pins round, 1 to 64 sequentially:
+ easily fit to the schematic, 4x16 pin
+ easy to create the symbol
- no functional grouping
- harder to understand the final
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 21:02 +0200, Tamas Szabo wrote:
However, since in my opinion schematic is a logical thing, I prefer the
second option.
Which is the better solution?
Thx,
/sza2
I generally do both variants and put it to gedasymbols, i.e. my AT90USB
symbol and many other. If
I generally do both variants and put it to gedasymbols, i.e. my AT90USB
symbol and many other.
Yes, but it is a double work:-)
If you make the symbols with tragesym, then
changing pinorder is not much work.
I use (my modified) tragesym. Great tool, pin order really not a matter.
Assigning
10 matches
Mail list logo
